Evaluates AI agents' ability to complete end-to-end scientific workflows by releasing and assessing 97 tasks from a 300-task FrontierChallenge suite across chemistry, materials, life science, and electrochemistry. Finds that top agent configurations achieved only a 20.6% pass rate despite high partial scores, revealing a gap between partial progress/confident completion claims and actual complete scientific deliverables.
Adapts off-policy RL stabilizers to the available data regime: introduces WarpSAC, a regime-aware family using Sample Weight Decay plus two regime-matched variants (WarpSAC-L and WarpSAC-A) to improve sample efficiency, wall-time learning, and sim-to-real deployment.
Converts image-level rewards into explicit intermediate targets for diffusion-model denoising via an on-policy self-distillation loop. Constructs bounded positive/negative targets around anchors from reward gradients, fits those targets with finite updates, and refreshes a behavior policy by EMA—improving aligned performance across backbones while reducing GPU hours.
Provides aggregated, privacy-preserving cluster outputs from three external research teams' analyses of ~250k Claude/Claude Code conversations; includes per-team CSVs (Stanford, Oxford, METR) for studying human–AI collaboration and model behavior without raw conversations.
Synthesizes, repairs, and self-evolves task-adaptive agent harnesses on demand for off-the-shelf LLM agents, using a trainable harness-intelligence model that distills signals from past configurations. Demonstrates consistent performance gains across benchmarks and model families by producing four-module, composable harnesses.