Introduces SemComp-Bench: a benchmark and VLM-based evaluation protocol for measuring outcome achievement and task-relevant semantic grounding in instruction-driven video generation. Ships with SemComp-Data, curated image–instruction–outcome triplets and OA/GR scoring.
An uncensored, weight-modified variant of Qwen3.8-27B that surgically removes the model's refusal directions to produce 0% refusals while aiming to preserve or improve capability. Uses complementary abliteration blending (SVD + LEACE blend) and ships with recommended greedy inference settings; intended for AI-safety research and red‑teaming, not for causing harm.
Contains ~2 million human pairwise preference judgments comparing images generated from text prompts; each example pairs two images with a preferred/tie label and is formatted for preference learning, reward-model training, and evaluation.
Proposes FACET, a framework that synthesizes verifiable terminal tasks by reconstructing scenario intent and grounding instruction, solution, and verifier in a shared executable container state. Key features include environment-first generation, execution-based validation, and targeted repair to preserve source intent and cross-artifact consistency.
Evaluates whether coding agents can modify real scientific software while preserving domain-specific scientific contracts. Contains 119 repository-level tasks across 98 GitHub projects and 20 scientific domains, measures reproducible edits in pinned Docker images, and analyzes recurring failure modes.
Evaluates visual reasoning in video generation models using 27 photorealistic tasks (810 instances), a two-level taxonomy of domains and skill tags, and task designs that enforce valid intermediate trajectories and calibrated difficulty.
Benchmarks assistant-style, multi-turn interaction for omni-modal LLMs on real-time video by reverse-engineering Internet clips into guided multi-turn interactions. It provides predefined priors and segment-level constraints so models must follow exact routes while being evaluated on answer correctness, timing, visual-prompt handling, and context retention.
Assesses mobile planning agents' ability to call tools, plan long-horizon workflows, and coordinate sub-agents in realistic, interactive phone scenarios via a stateful executable sandbox. Covers 13 domains, 212 tools, evidence-based verification, and tests memory, skill usage, permission and runtime constraints.
Evaluates whether tool-using LLM agents reliably complete stateful business workflows via 507 executable agent–tool–user tasks across retail, travel, auto insurance, neobank, and IT/HR consulting. Provides browsable Parquet tables for tasks, scenarios, and agent instructions; v1.0 is intended for evaluation-only.
Develops methods to scale agentic AI for sustained, verifiable execution of complex long-horizon work by expanding executable environments and training coordinated agents with a shared execution harness (AgentOS) to maintain state, provenance, and failure recovery.
Evaluates AI agents' ability to complete end-to-end scientific workflows by releasing and assessing 97 tasks from a 300-task FrontierChallenge suite across chemistry, materials, life science, and electrochemistry. Finds that top agent configurations achieved only a 20.6% pass rate despite high partial scores, revealing a gap between partial progress/confident completion claims and actual complete scientific deliverables.
A natively multimodal model for text and image→text generation, long-context reasoning, and complex coding/agent workloads. Uses 320B total / 18B active params with a hybrid sparse+linear attention and manifold-constrained hyper-connections to reduce long-context serving cost.