AIAny
Icon for item

MobileMem: Learning from a Year of Mobile Experiences

Provides a year-scale multimodal benchmark and evaluation framework for on-device long-term memory in personal assistants, built from real mobile user trajectories. Tests memory construction, retrieval, updating, temporal reasoning, and implicit preference inference, and includes a knowledge-grounded synthesis pipeline to form coherent long-horizon trajectories.

Introduction

Realistic personal assistants must remember and adapt to a user's evolving experiences over months, but most memory benchmarks reduce personalization to short dialogs or isolated facts. MobileMem flips that assumption: it treats a year of mobile usage as the unit of experience, asking memory systems to aggregate fragmented signals across apps, modalities, and time so agents can answer long-horizon questions and update beliefs as users change.

Key Findings
  • Benchmark design: MobileMem supplies year-scale user trajectories in both text and multimodal (omni) splits, pairing chronologically ordered app events, conversations, and screenshots with long-horizon QA that require multi-hop retrieval and temporal integration. This emphasizes experience-level memory rather than single-shot retrieval.
  • Synthesis & realism: A knowledge-grounded experience synthesis pipeline (used to produce coherent lifelong trajectories from fragmented sessions) enables temporally consistent scenarios where attributes, habits, and preferences must be inferred from distributed traces across apps.
  • Evaluation protocol: Systems process sessions in chronological order, incrementally build or update memory, and answer retained questions from the final memory state—making failures traceable to what the memory retrieved vs. model reasoning.
  • Research implications: Experiments reveal gaps in current memory systems, especially in updating changing preferences and aggregating sparse cross-app evidence, highlighting memory design as the primary bottleneck for long-horizon personalization.
Who it's for and tradeoffs

Great fit if you research or build personalized assistants, retrieval/memory architectures for agents, or multimodal long-horizon benchmarks and need realistic mobile behavior traces and targeted probes (e.g., temporal QA, implicit preference inference). Look elsewhere if you need purely conversational benchmarks, very large-scale public user logs (privacy constraints limit raw real-world data release), or turnkey memory systems—the contribution is a benchmark and synthesis framework, not a drop-in production memory service.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • AuthorsXinle Deng, Yida Xue, Xiangyuan Ru, Haoming Xu, Shuofei Qiao, Mengru Wang, Yijun Chen, Buqiang Xu, Chen Jiang, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang …
  • Published date2026/08/11

More Items

Analyzes how proposer–solver loops in self-evolving search agents can develop shared errors (co-cheating) that inflate internal rewards; introduces Multi-Sample Verification and CrossFit (cross-fitted scoring with partitioned sources) to reduce false agreement and improve downstream search performance.

Co-evolves candidate solutions and web-search queries to help LLM-driven evolutionary discovery, using a retrieval gate plus bilevel inner/outer loops that refine queries, rank documents by predicted solution value, and generate evaluated candidates.

Defines and evaluates AREX-2, an LLM agent that iteratively self-improves at test time via reflection and long-horizon execution. Trained on long-horizon improvement trajectories from ML engineering and algorithmic programming (built on Qwen3.8-27B), it scales with more rounds and achieves strong benchmark scores.