Provides IdeaGene-Bench, a dataset and evaluation suite for scientific-lineage reasoning and lineage-grounded idea generation, representing papers as minimal, typed Idea Genome objects and GenomeDiffs that record inheritance, mutation, loss, import and novel insertion. Includes 1,961 lineage traces, IG-Exam (42 task types) and IG-Arena with a Population-Evolution Score for generation.
Provides fixed-seed benchmark instances (prompts and agent-visible inputs) for ASI-Bench to run reproducible evaluations of LLM agents on scientific tasks. Includes four matched prompt levels (B1–B4) across 60 project-level tasks in 11 domains; excludes reference answers and private scorers; Apache-2.0 licensed.
Evaluates multimodal context learning across grounding, new information application, and knowledge acquisition using a 3,443-instance benchmark spanning science, finance, long documents, spatial reasoning, and web VQA; finds current multimodal models perform poorly (best score 0.2847) and analyzes failure modes.
Generated instance set (seed 31415) for ASI‑Bench: includes four matched prompt variants, agent-visible inputs, reference artifacts, and instance metadata for 60 project-scale scientific research tasks across 11 domains; intended for evaluating autonomous research agents. Licensed Apache‑2.0.
Finetunes Qwen3.6‑35B using an adversarial generator–critic loop that synthesizes ~10,000 verifiable “frontier” tasks to boost scientific research, long‑horizon reasoning, coding and tool use; supports an extended 262,144‑token context and common serving stacks.
Evaluates whether AI systems can independently carry out project-level scientific research by progressively removing human methodological guidance across 60 tasks in 11 domains. Built with expert review, sandbox execution, and multi-agent–model scoring to measure innovation and autonomous experimental execution.
Evaluates whether coding agents can modify real scientific software while preserving domain-specific scientific contracts. Contains 119 repository-level tasks across 98 GitHub projects and 20 scientific domains, measures reproducible edits in pinned Docker images, and analyzes recurring failure modes.
Evaluates AI agents' ability to complete end-to-end scientific workflows by releasing and assessing 97 tasks from a 300-task FrontierChallenge suite across chemistry, materials, life science, and electrochemistry. Finds that top agent configurations achieved only a 20.6% pass rate despite high partial scores, revealing a gap between partial progress/confident completion claims and actual complete scientific deliverables.