Evaluates multimodal LLMs on streaming egocentric video for spatial intelligence using 1,680 human-annotated questions across 348 videos; organizes tasks into four hierarchical levels (perception → tracking → simulation → allocentric mapping) and highlights allocentric mapping as the main bottleneck.
Enables agents to proactively discover multiple hidden problems in a user context and pair each with supporting evidence and concrete actions. Uses iterative discovery (batch rounds conditioned on prior finds) and reusable "thought templates" to expand coverage and ground claims.
Represents episodic memory as a Cue–Tag–Content graph and integrates LLM reasoning into active retrieval so agents iteratively reconstruct and prune evidence paths for long-horizon questions. Reports up to 23% gains on LoCoMo / LongMemEval while reducing token and runtime costs.
Benchmark for evaluating proactive LLM mediators in realistic, multi-domain conflict scenarios by constructing cases from real disputes, probing five socio-cognitive adaptation axes, and using a topic-localized evaluator that achieves 0.82 alignment with human experts.
Benchmark that measures an agent's ability to discriminate fine-grained relational structure in long-term memories. It embeds relation-controlled memory variants into realistic user–agent histories and tests downstream recovery and reasoning, highlighting where current memory systems fail.
Evaluates whether role-playing language agents follow a character's evolving psychological arc rather than a fixed persona, using ArcANE — an automatically constructed benchmark spanning 17 novels and 80 principal characters. Tests both in-text and out-of-text scenarios and compares context strategies and fine-tuned models.
Dynamic interactive benchmark that tests whether LLM agents can adaptively plan and re-plan when world and user constraints are progressively revealed. Built on 307 household tasks with a multi-turn protocol that exposes hidden constraints only after plan violations, emphasizing iterative revision and constraint inference.
Measures how coding agents explore repositories by asking them to return a ranked, line-level list of code regions relevant to an issue under a fixed line budget. Covers 848 issues across 203 repos and 10 languages; evaluates coverage, ranking, and context-efficiency to isolate exploration quality.
Decouples perception and reasoning for hours-long videos by streaming inputs into a three-tier Hierarchical Graph Memory and using an agentic Observation–Reason–Action retrieval loop; reduces reasoning context to ~2% of full video while improving benchmark accuracy.
Benchmark for long-horizon computer-use agents that must orchestrate GUI, CLI, and code operations within single trajectories across 114 real-world tasks. Evaluated on a real Ubuntu desktop and paired with a trajectory-aware judge that inspects deliverables, artifacts, and action traces—revealing a top PassRate of ~41.2%.
A benchmark that evaluates interactive spatial reasoning for multimodal agents in realistic tasks. It unifies eight heterogeneous simulators under a simulator-agnostic protocol, provides 760 human-annotated tasks with vision-only partial observability, and uses text-based actions plus terminal-state verification to measure task success.
Guides LLM-based agents to decompose long-horizon research problems and delegate subtasks to constrained subagents, then fine-tunes models on harness-generated trajectories so delegation decisions become internalized. Reports SearchSwarm-30B-A3B achieving top BrowseComp scores for its scale.