AIAny

Tongyi DeepResearch Technical Report

Trains long-horizon web researchers by combining agentic mid-training, synthetic trajectories, and reinforcement learning. A 30.5B-parameter model activates 3.3B parameters per token and learns to plan, search, and synthesize evidence.

Introduction

Long research runs can fail because a model never learned how to investigate, even when its language skills are strong. The central insight here is to teach agent behavior before post-training, then refine it through environmental feedback rather than rely on elaborate orchestration alone.

Key Findings
  • Agentic mid-training bridges ordinary pretraining and task-specific post-training, giving the model prior experience with planning, reasoning, and tool decisions.
  • Automatically synthesized questions and trajectories support both supervised cold starts and reinforcement learning; stage-specific environments make costly web interaction more manageable.
  • The reported model reaches 32.9 on Humanity's Last Exam and 90.6 on FRAMES, but its 43.4 BrowseComp score remains below OpenAI o3's 49.7 in the same comparison. Strength varies by task.
Who Should Read It

Great fit if you are designing training data, environments, or reinforcement learning for research agents. Look elsewhere if you need evidence of unrestricted tool generalization or consistently faithful long reports: the authors identify predefined tools, 128K context, and report fidelity as continuing constraints.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • OrganizationsTongyi Lab, Alibaba Group
  • AuthorsBaixuan Li, Bo Zhang, Dingchu Zhang, Fei Huang, Guangyu Li, Guoxin Chen, Huifeng Yin, Jialong Wu, Jingren Zhou, Kuan Li …
  • Published date2025/10/28

More Items

Embeds an agent's reasoning together with its search query to improve retrieval. Trains a 4B embedding model on synthesized deep-research trajectories, helping preserve intent across multi-step searches.

Trains an 8B model to search, synthesize evidence, and write cited research reports. Its reinforcement-learning rewards use evolving rubrics grounded in retrieved evidence and contrasting model responses.

Tests research agents on 100 expert-written tasks across 22 fields. Separates report quality from citation reliability, using adaptive reference-based grading and checks that cited pages support individual claims.