AIAny
Icon for item

Transferring the Intelligence of VLMs to Robotic Control

Uses a compact discrete-action interface (translation, rotation, gripper) to let frozen vision–language models control robots in closed-loop, and leverages in-context (one-shot) demonstrations to substantially improve manipulation success without robot-specific training.

Introduction

Pretrained vision–language models encode broad digital-world reasoning. This work asks whether that intelligence can be translated to physical robot control without task-specific robot training. The key insight: expose a human‑intuitive, semantically meaningful discrete action space and let a frozen VLM act in closed loop, then ground its interface use and strategies with a few in‑context demonstrations.

Key Findings
  • Interface-first approach: a compact set of discrete motion primitives (unit translations, rotations, gripper open/close) turns manipulation into semantically interpretable decisions the VLM can reason over.
  • Closed-loop visual decision-making: the VLM repeatedly observes the scene, selects a discrete primitive, executes it, and adapts—avoiding direct low-level control prediction.
  • Strong zero-shot and one-shot gains: on RoboTwin 2.0 C2R zero-shot success is 53.2% (vs. baseline π0.5 at 46.0%), and a single in-context demonstration raises it to 73.6% (+20.4 points). On RoboDojo success rises from 35.67% to 47.17% (+11.5 points) with one demonstration.
  • Real-world transfer: same framework controls a Franka robot for block‑in‑basket and block‑stacking tasks without robot-specific parameter updates.
What Sets It Apart
  • So what: instead of costly robot-specific policy training, intelligence is transferred by aligning the robot interface to the VLM's reasoning space, enabling immediate deployment of frozen multimodal models.
  • So what: a single in-context demo grounds both primitive semantics and task strategy, providing large gains with zero fine-tuning.
  • So what: discrete, semantically labeled primitives make behavior interpretable and embodiment-agnostic, easing transfer across simulated benchmarks and a real arm.
Who it's for and trade-offs
  • Great fit if you want to evaluate or deploy pretrained VLMs for manipulation tasks quickly, prefer interpretable action abstractions, or need cross-benchmark transfer without collecting robot data.
  • Look elsewhere if you require smooth continuous low‑level control, high-frequency closed-loop control at actuator rates, or tasks that demand learned high-precision dynamics compensation—those still benefit from robot-specific training and low-level controllers.
Method overview

The pipeline freezes a VLM, provides image observations plus a discrete-action interface, and uses prompt-style in-context demonstrations to teach the model how to map observations to primitives and higher-level strategies. An embodiment-specific interpreter deterministically grounds primitives into actual robot motions.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • OrganizationsTsinghua University, Tencent Hunyuan
  • AuthorsMeng-Hao Guo, Zhe-Han Mo, Jia-Jun Wang, Yi Zhang, Kejin Wang, Yi-Xuan Deng, Jia-Peng Zhang, Yongming Rao, Shi-Min Hu
  • Published date2026/09/19

More Items

Trains a single agent policy with successful trajectories from specialized sibling harnesses when attempts under the base harness all fail. The resulting policy improves under the original harness, with optional task-specific harness routing at inference.

Hugging Face

Provides synchronized visual and tactile demonstrations for bimanual manipulation, with four fingertip tactile streams recorded on every frame. Collected using handheld grippers rather than robot execution, it supports research on contact-rich imitation learning and multimodal perception.

Lets robot manipulation policies draw on visual representations from different depths of a vision-language backbone instead of relying on a separate encoder’s fixed output. The approach improves control results on LIBERO and real-world tasks.