AIAny
Icon for item

MerchantBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Term Coherence in E-Commerce Operations

A 365-day, order-level simulation benchmark for evaluating long-term coherence of LLM agents in seller-side e-commerce. Grounded in 98,843 real product records and 26 interactive tools, it pairs prompt upstream supplier signals with delayed downstream order outcomes to stress planning, memory, and tool use over long horizons.

Introduction

Long-horizon consistency — preserving purposeful, adaptive behavior across many interdependent steps and delayed feedback — is a core obstacle for autonomous LLM agents that most short benchmarks miss. This work supplies a persistent, economically grounded simulation that forces agents to manage sourcing, listings, pricing, cash flow, and delayed order lifecycles over a full year, making delayed consequences and revisit logic first-class evaluation criteria.

Key Findings
  • Realistic, long-horizon setup: a 365-day, order-level simulator grounded in 98,843 real e-commerce product records and instrumented with 26 merchant-visible tools that let agents modify catalogs, place orders, and inspect supplier/order states. This design couples promptly observable upstream supplier events with delayed downstream order outcomes, creating mixed-latency feedback.
  • Broad evaluation matrix: eight LLMs under two agent frameworks (a minimal controller/ReAct-style baseline and a richer agent with planning, memory, and skill integrations) across 48 runs. Each run tracks per-order lifecycles, cash flow, penalties, and reputation.
  • Quantified gap to humans: the best LLM configuration reached only 27.3% of the mean final net assets achieved by human participants, highlighting severe deficits in long-horizon planning, evidence aggregation, and adaptive recovery.
  • Practical stress tests: the benchmark exposes failures in revisiting earlier decisions, handling supplier disruptions, balancing inventory/cash constraints, and summarizing long histories effectively for future decisions.
Who it's for and tradeoffs

Great fit if you need a reproducible stress test for agent-level planning, memory/summarization strategies, tool-use policies, or research on mixed-latency feedback adaptation in economically grounded settings. The simulator is valuable for comparing agent architectures, controller designs, and memory compression strategies under realistic business constraints.

Look elsewhere if your goal is immediate production evaluation of conversational quality or short-horizon tasks: the environment is domain-specific (seller-side e-commerce) and emphasizes long-term economic metrics over single-turn language metrics. Also, because it is a simulation with many domain-specific assumptions, transferred conclusions should be validated on real deployment data before production decisions.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • AuthorsQiming Shi, Yulong Tao, Linbo Jin, Zhaolu Kang, Yibo Dou, Jiawen Zhu, Tianjun Pan, Shaokang Fu, Chengyu Wang, Siyue Li …
  • Published date2026/07/31

More Items

Separates multi-agent prompts into shared coordination rules and agent-specific execution instructions, then guides their optimization according to each role. It can be paired with existing optimizers and improves results across benchmarks in several domains.

Generates interactive game video from explicit character, scene, and combat state, enabling real-time control and zero-shot generalization to unseen scenes, characters, and actions.

Trains an agent orchestrator through recursive self-play, then withdraws skills once they stop improving performance. Learnability-driven task selection and controlled skill evaluations aim to move the system toward deployment without external skills.