AIAny
Icon for item

Apodex 1.1: Scaling Agentic Intelligence for Complex Work

Develops methods to scale agentic AI for sustained, verifiable execution of complex long-horizon work by expanding executable environments and training coordinated agents with a shared execution harness (AgentOS) to maintain state, provenance, and failure recovery.

Introduction

Most LLM research focuses on single-turn reasoning or short tool-assisted tasks. Real-world complex work instead needs sustained, verifiable progress across files, search, code, and multiple agents — including state maintenance, asynchronous delegation, failure recovery, and end-to-end verification. This paper frames and advances that "working capability" by scaling both environments and agentic coordination so models can complete multi-step professional tasks reliably over time.

Key Findings
  • Environment scaling: Expands the diversity and verifiability of executable environments (files, search, code) so agent behaviors can be executed and audited, not just speculated in-context. This increases reproducibility and enables training from real execution trajectories.
  • Agentic coordination scaling: Trains agents to decompose long-horizon tasks, delegate parallel work, integrate asynchronous results, replan, and preserve provenance — shifting behavior from single-agent loops to orchestrated multi-agent workflows.
  • Shared execution harness (AgentOS): A runtime that maintains task state, checkpoints, and provenance across tools and agents, letting the system recover from failures and perform global verification and repair before delivery.
  • Empirical outcome: The system attains top-tier performance on diverse professional, scientific, mathematical, coding, and search workloads while using smaller base models; a 35B-parameter Apodex 1.1 Mini preserves strong working capability suitable for local deployment.
Who it's for and trade-offs

Great fit if you need AI to complete multi-step, auditable work that interacts with files, executables, and external search — e.g., research assistants, engineering tasks, finance workflows, or long-running coding projects. The approach favors systems where verifiability, provenance, and recoverability matter as much as raw single-step accuracy. Look elsewhere if your needs are short-horizon, latency-sensitive inference with minimal external state or if you require turnkey cloud-hosted closed-source agents; the focus here is on robust long-horizon execution and training infrastructure rather than lightweight conversational APIs.

Where it fits

Positions itself between single-agent LLM tool-using systems and fully hand-engineered workflow engines: it combines environment-level scaling (to make executions inspectable and trainable) with coordination-level scaling (to orchestrate distributed agent work), aiming to provide a practical "heavy-duty solver" for ambitious, verifiable tasks.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • AuthorsApodex Team, B. An, B. Li, B. Wang, B. Zhang, B. L. Wang, C. Feng, C. Wei, C. Xue, C. Zhang
  • Published date2026/08/24

Categories

More Items

Assesses mobile planning agents' ability to call tools, plan long-horizon workflows, and coordinate sub-agents in realistic, interactive phone scenarios via a stateful executable sandbox. Covers 13 domains, 212 tools, evidence-based verification, and tests memory, skill usage, permission and runtime constraints.

Proposes “Graph Engineering”: using explicit, dynamic graphs to represent tasks, agents, tools, and system state so LLM-based agent systems can coordinate, persist, and evolve. Surveys principles, methods, applications, and curates related resources.

Evaluates whether coding agents can modify real scientific software while preserving domain-specific scientific contracts. Contains 119 repository-level tasks across 98 GitHub projects and 20 scientific domains, measures reproducible edits in pinned Docker images, and analyzes recurring failure modes.