AIAny

DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report

Open-weight Mixture-of-Experts LLM with 671B total parameters but 37B activated per token, trained on 14.8T tokens for 2.788M H800 GPU-hours. Matches leading closed models at a fraction of typical training cost via FP8 and architectural tricks.

Introduction

The headline number is the one that breaks intuition: a 671B-parameter model trained for roughly $5.6M in compute. DeepSeek-V3 makes the case that the next frontier isn't more GPUs but better systems engineering — co-designing the model, the training algorithm, and the FP8 numerical stack so a Mixture-of-Experts model activates just 37B of its 671B parameters per token without the load-balancing headaches that usually wreck sparse training.

Key Findings
  • An auxiliary-loss-free load-balancing scheme replaces the usual balancing loss, so experts stay evenly used without the accuracy tax that auxiliary losses impose.
  • Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) compresses the KV cache, cutting the inference memory that normally makes long-context serving expensive.
  • A multi-token prediction objective densifies the training signal and doubles as speculative decoding at inference time.
  • Native FP8 mixed-precision training across 2.788M H800 GPU-hours, with reported stability and zero loss-spike rollbacks across the entire 14.8T-token run.
How It Holds Up

On knowledge, math, and code benchmarks it lands ahead of other open-weight models and within reach of GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet — a gap that, before this paper, most assumed required a closed lab's budget. The recipe, not just the weights, is the contribution.

Who It's For

Great fit if you're a researcher or infra team studying efficient large-scale training, or want strong open weights you can self-host and fine-tune. Look elsewhere if you need a turnkey hosted API with guarantees, or lack the multi-node H800-class hardware to actually run a 671B MoE — the open weights don't make the serving footprint small.

Information

  • Websitearxiv.org
  • OrganizationsDeepSeek-AI
  • AuthorsDeepSeek-AI, Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang
  • Published date2024/12/27

More Items

Introduces AISPA, a user-centric framework to audit system prompts in LLM applications, and applies it to 3,249 instructions from 88 commercial products to classify protective versus problematic instructions. Highlights design variability, growing prompt length/protection, persistent problematic directives, and calls for transparency and oversight.

Transforms open-ended LLM optimization into self-verifiable reinforcement learning by turning tasks into proxy environments that produce deterministic, rule-based rewards. Proposes RLSVR and SpyRL — an information-asymmetric self-play scheme where agents vote to identify a preassigned spy, yielding verifiable rewards without human annotation. Demonstrated on summarization, creative writing and mathematical reasoning.

Co-evolves a solver skill and a rubric-generator skill for text-space LLM optimization under decoupled objectives to avoid rubric gaming without using gold rubrics. Solver updates use criterion-level feedback; generator updates use independent audits of requirement coverage and response discrimination.