AIAny
Icon for item

Mental Association Dataset (Rapidata/psychology-association-kiki-bouba-etc)

Collects ~200,000 human responses to 20 visual/semantic association questions (e.g., Bouba–Kiki), with per-response image options and demographic metadata — useful for cross‑cultural perception and evaluation of multimodal systems, but not guaranteed as a rigorously controlled experimental sample.

Introduction

Classic perceptual patterns (like Bouba–Kiki) are often presented as universal; this dataset shows they can shift with phrasing and language demographics.

What Sets It Apart
  • Large-scale, human-judgment focus: ~200k responses collected across 20 binary association questions (~10k responses per question), enabling stable aggregate and subgroup analyses.
  • Multimodal rows: each question pairs two images with a short prompt and stores per-respondent selection plus demographic fields (country, language, age, gender, occupation) and a quality score.
  • Fast, repeatable collection pipeline: gathered via the Rapidata API, so the dataset reflects pragmatic, web-panel style sampling useful for model evaluation and behavioral signal mining rather than tightly controlled lab experiments.
Core capabilities and uses
  • Cross-cultural analysis: compare selections by language or country to study linguistic influence on perception (the dataset already shows divergent Bouba–Kiki trends by language).
  • Multimodal evaluation: use per-response labels and images to benchmark vision+language models or to probe alignment between model and human intuition.
  • Exploratory cognitive science: suitable for hypothesis generation and large-N descriptive statistics where convenience sampling is acceptable.
Who it fits — and trade-offs

Great fit if you want a large, labeled set of human association judgments for model evaluation, feature probing, or cross-cultural signal discovery. Look elsewhere if you need randomized controlled experiments, exhaustive demographic balancing, or clinical-grade data provenance — the sampling is convenience/web-panel based, some demographics are self-reported, and phrasing/translation effects can bias results.

Practical notes

Data is provided in optimized Parquet form and can be loaded via the Hugging Face datasets library; individual-response lists are nested under detailed_results. The dataset card documents known quirks (phrasing effects, possible overrepresentation of some language groups) that should be accounted for in analysis.

Information

Categories

More Items

Hugging Face

Provides 12 million verified source/edited image pairs with per-sample edit instructions and VQA-style quality checks for large-scale training and evaluation of instruction-based image editing models. Features a 1,000+ fine-grained edit taxonomy and multi-concept dense-supervision bundles; data is distributed as TAR shards for scalable extraction.

Benchmarks assistant-style, multi-turn interaction for omni-modal LLMs on real-time video by reverse-engineering Internet clips into guided multi-turn interactions. It provides predefined priors and segment-level constraints so models must follow exact routes while being evaluated on answer correctness, timing, visual-prompt handling, and context retention.

Hugging Face

Provides a CC0-licensed corpus of 11,045,085 Turkish court decisions (1962–2026) in Parquet: 31.5 billion characters, 5.5 GB—designed for retrieval, summarization, classification and RAG workflows.