AIAny
Icon for item

Mental Association Dataset (Rapidata/psychology-association-kiki-bouba-etc)

Collects ~200,000 human responses to 20 visual/semantic association questions (e.g., Bouba–Kiki), with per-response image options and demographic metadata — useful for cross‑cultural perception and evaluation of multimodal systems, but not guaranteed as a rigorously controlled experimental sample.

Introduction

Classic perceptual patterns (like Bouba–Kiki) are often presented as universal; this dataset shows they can shift with phrasing and language demographics.

What Sets It Apart
  • Large-scale, human-judgment focus: ~200k responses collected across 20 binary association questions (~10k responses per question), enabling stable aggregate and subgroup analyses.
  • Multimodal rows: each question pairs two images with a short prompt and stores per-respondent selection plus demographic fields (country, language, age, gender, occupation) and a quality score.
  • Fast, repeatable collection pipeline: gathered via the Rapidata API, so the dataset reflects pragmatic, web-panel style sampling useful for model evaluation and behavioral signal mining rather than tightly controlled lab experiments.
Core capabilities and uses
  • Cross-cultural analysis: compare selections by language or country to study linguistic influence on perception (the dataset already shows divergent Bouba–Kiki trends by language).
  • Multimodal evaluation: use per-response labels and images to benchmark vision+language models or to probe alignment between model and human intuition.
  • Exploratory cognitive science: suitable for hypothesis generation and large-N descriptive statistics where convenience sampling is acceptable.
Who it fits — and trade-offs

Great fit if you want a large, labeled set of human association judgments for model evaluation, feature probing, or cross-cultural signal discovery. Look elsewhere if you need randomized controlled experiments, exhaustive demographic balancing, or clinical-grade data provenance — the sampling is convenience/web-panel based, some demographics are self-reported, and phrasing/translation effects can bias results.

Practical notes

Data is provided in optimized Parquet form and can be loaded via the Hugging Face datasets library; individual-response lists are nested under detailed_results. The dataset card documents known quirks (phrasing effects, possible overrepresentation of some language groups) that should be accounted for in analysis.

Information

Categories

More Items

Hugging Face

De-identified longitudinal multimodal CT dataset for multicancer screening that pairs ~24k CT volumes with radiology reports and voxel-wise tumor annotations across 13 cancer types. Designed for longitudinal disease modeling, detection/segmentation and vision–language research; CC BY‑NC‑ND 4.0 for non-commercial use.

Hugging Face

Provides 98,877 historical newspaper page images (1700s–1940s) paired with ALTO OCR, per-word confidences and line/word bounding boxes in image pixels — ready for line-level OCR training, OCR quality estimation, re‑OCR comparisons and layout analysis. OCR is library-produced (silver); image resolutions and OCR quality vary.

Hugging Face

Provides 1.21M densely annotated desktop screenshots and 159.7M element instances for training and evaluating GUI grounding and screen-parsing models. Includes per-element accessibility-derived annotations, 917K recorded click transitions, multi-application scenes across seven appearance presets and resolutions; distributed as WebDataset shards with Parquet indexes.